Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1853

reference
50-tree-1
name
1853
tree-preservation-order

undefined

50-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.987513 50.793331)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.987457 50.793325,-0.987459 50.793336,-0.987467 50.793346,-0.987479 50.793354,-0.987495 50.793359,-0.987512 50.793361,-0.987530 50.793360,-0.987546 50.793355,-0.987559 50.793347,-0.987567 50.793337,-0.987570 50.793326,-0.987567 50.793315,-0.987560 50.793304,-0.987547 50.793296,-0.987532 50.793291,-0.987514 50.793289,-0.987496 50.793291,-0.987481 50.793296,-0.987468 50.793304,-0.987460 50.793314,-0.987457 50.793325)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL